Subject: PCHG How?
Date: Mon, 09 May 94 22:52:48 
From: "Richard Willkomm" <richard@hell.hacktic.nl>

 
> renderings 
> (Haven't a graphics card yet).

Me neither. :-(

> I've tried a little with WASP 2.02. But it does give me some heavy
> banding. 

Never tried it.

> then do the PCHG conversion. A little better but it's still not
> accepable.
> HamLabPlus any better?

I always use Hires/24 bit source files with Hamlabplus. These files
give you near AGA quality when you convert them to PCHG (depends on
kind of picture). I would certainly suggest using Hamlabplus. Don't 
forget to use a sliced pallete with a setting of about 7 
(depending on machine speed).

I've been using it for quite a while and I think it's great. It also
creates the smallest JPG files of all programs I know and still gives
you very good quality. If it would be possible to animate in
PCHG/Hires I wouldn't need a AGA machine, because PCHG is smaller and
gives very good results.

Greetings

**********************************************************************
*                    | Richard Willkomm  ----- The Ray Freak-----    *
*                    |                                            -- *
*  ########  ####    | A500/GVP-HD+/030-33/882-50/9Mb/213MB      --  *
*      #   # #       | Gfx Co-Sysop The Hell BBS The Hague Holland   *
*      # ##  ###     | +31-70-3468783                          --    *
*      #  #  #       | e-mail : richard@hell.hacktic.nl  --   --     *
*      #   # #       | NLA_net: 14:101/103.2              -- --      *
*                    | AMY_net: 39:153/108.2               ---       *
*                    |                                               *
*                    | The Amiga isn't dead yet....Stay tuned.....   *
**********************************************************************



                           -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=-