Subject: PCHG How? Date: Mon, 09 May 94 22:52:48 From: "Richard Willkomm" <richard@hell.hacktic.nl> > renderings > (Haven't a graphics card yet). Me neither. :-( > I've tried a little with WASP 2.02. But it does give me some heavy > banding. Never tried it. > then do the PCHG conversion. A little better but it's still not > accepable. > HamLabPlus any better? I always use Hires/24 bit source files with Hamlabplus. These files give you near AGA quality when you convert them to PCHG (depends on kind of picture). I would certainly suggest using Hamlabplus. Don't forget to use a sliced pallete with a setting of about 7 (depending on machine speed). I've been using it for quite a while and I think it's great. It also creates the smallest JPG files of all programs I know and still gives you very good quality. If it would be possible to animate in PCHG/Hires I wouldn't need a AGA machine, because PCHG is smaller and gives very good results. Greetings ********************************************************************** * | Richard Willkomm ----- The Ray Freak----- * * | -- * * ######## #### | A500/GVP-HD+/030-33/882-50/9Mb/213MB -- * * # # # | Gfx Co-Sysop The Hell BBS The Hague Holland * * # ## ### | +31-70-3468783 -- * * # # # | e-mail : richard@hell.hacktic.nl -- -- * * # # # | NLA_net: 14:101/103.2 -- -- * * | AMY_net: 39:153/108.2 --- * * | * * | The Amiga isn't dead yet....Stay tuned..... * ********************************************************************** -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=-